Skip to content

web: "Related Cards" inconsistencies #7

@Nilhcem

Description

How to handle "related card" references?
Should we specify them in their own section, in a single-line entry (as in hurt-often, poutsma-principle), or in multiple entries (as in acceptance-criteria) ?

Some other inconsistencies:

  • done.md: "Related cards" is not written in the right place, we should also replace ## Code Review by ### References
  • two-minute-rule.md: related cards have no link

Metadata

Metadata

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type
No fields configured for issues without a type.

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions