Skip to content

ci: point the CI workflow at BHoM/CI_Toolkit - #222

Merged
sakanni merged 1 commit into
developfrom
CI_Toolkit_Proxy-#13-RefreshCIWorkflow
Aug 18, 2026
Merged

ci: point the CI workflow at BHoM/CI_Toolkit#222
sakanni merged 1 commit into
developfrom
CI_Toolkit_Proxy-#13-RefreshCIWorkflow

Conversation

@sakanni

@sakanni sakanni commented Aug 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

CI_Toolkit moved from BuroHappoldEngineeringAdmin to BHoM. The old path redirects, so this removes a dependency on the redirect rather than fixing a break.

Also picks up two pattern corrections made since this file was copied: dataset compliance now uses a case-insensitive unanchored pathspec, and project compliance matches AssemblyInfo.cs at any depth instead of only at the repo root. Neither changes which files are selected in this repo today.

Still non-blocking. Tracked in CI_Toolkit_Proxy#13.

@peterjamesnugent peterjamesnugent left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Happy with changes just repointing the path to BHoM/CI_Toolkit as evidenced by the checks passing,

@sakanni sakanni added the type:compliance Non-conforming to code guidelines label Aug 17, 2026
@bhombot-ci

bhombot-ci Bot commented Aug 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@sakanni just to let you know, I have provided a check-ready-to-merge result to this Pull Request as it was detected to be linked to other Pull Requests in a series. The comment which triggered this check came from @sakanni on Socket_Toolkit

@sakanni
sakanni merged commit 19467b1 into develop Aug 18, 2026
20 checks passed
@sakanni
sakanni deleted the CI_Toolkit_Proxy-#13-RefreshCIWorkflow branch August 18, 2026 08:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

type:compliance Non-conforming to code guidelines

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants