Add missing Bybit address to cex_evms_addresses#1
Open
ModestusOkoye wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
While building a CEX flow analysis dashboard for MNT token on Ethereum, I noticed unusually large CEX inflow volumes that didn't match outflows.
Tracing the transactions on Etherscan, I found that address 0xe46620553d6b28e5d2520b366942990d8654f243 received 356M MNT from 0x828424517f9f04015db02169f4026d57b2b07229 (already labeled as Bybit 22 in this repo).
Arkham also confirms this address is Bybit-controlled; however, it was being misclassified as a retail wallet, inflating CEX inflow metrics in onchain analysis.