Skip to content

chore: upgrade Manage to 9.7.2, drop secret from oidc10_rp required#92

Merged
kayjoosten merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feature/update-manage
May 28, 2026
Merged

chore: upgrade Manage to 9.7.2, drop secret from oidc10_rp required#92
kayjoosten merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feature/update-manage

Conversation

@kayjoosten
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

sp-dashboard PRs SURFnet/sp-dashboard#1461 and SURFnet/sp-dashboard#1466 fix public OIDC client handling by omitting the secret field entirely instead of sending null (NPE in SecretHook) or "" (fails min-length validation). This required Manage to no longer mandate the secret field for oidc10_rp entities when isPublicClient is true.

The upstream Manage schema was updated post-9.7.2 to remove "secret" from the metaDataFields required array in oidc10_rp.schema.json. Confirmed against manage.test2.surfconext.nl: POST without secret field succeeds for public clients. Verified locally after this upgrade.

Changes:

  • docker-compose.yml: bump manage-server and manage-gui 9.6.2 → 9.7.2
  • application.yml: add push.stepup.* and product.jira_* required by 9.7.2
  • oidc10_rp.schema.json: remove "secret" from required array

sp-dashboard PRs SURFnet/sp-dashboard#1461 and SURFnet/sp-dashboard#1466
fix public OIDC client handling by omitting the secret field entirely
instead of sending null (NPE in SecretHook) or "" (fails min-length
validation). This required Manage to no longer mandate the secret field
for oidc10_rp entities when isPublicClient is true.

The upstream Manage schema was updated post-9.7.2 to remove "secret"
from the metaDataFields required array in oidc10_rp.schema.json.
Confirmed against manage.test2.surfconext.nl: POST without secret field
succeeds for public clients. Verified locally after this upgrade.

Changes:
- docker-compose.yml: bump manage-server and manage-gui 9.6.2 → 9.7.2
- application.yml: add push.stepup.* and product.jira_* required by 9.7.2
- oidc10_rp.schema.json: remove "secret" from required array
@kayjoosten kayjoosten requested a review from johanib May 27, 2026 13:07
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@johanib johanib left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

Curious: Where does the stepup config in application.yml come from and why is it needed?

@kayjoosten
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

lgtm

Curious: Where does the stepup config in application.yml come from and why is it needed?

I had the same question. Its for manage. Manage needs these params set in the newer version even when its disabled.

@kayjoosten kayjoosten merged commit d6b51a5 into main May 28, 2026
1 check passed
@johanib johanib deleted the feature/update-manage branch June 1, 2026 07:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants