feat: reset presentation state on subject replacement - #346
Merged
Conversation
…ject-replacement-semantics # Conflicts: # package.json
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Subject contract
A subject-bearing action is complete. Fields omitted from it use normal defaults. To patch the current instance, omit the subject; this patch form remains supported in v1.46.0 for compatibility but new content should not rely on it.
Compatibility
This intentionally changes older content that reauthored a subject while relying on inherited instance fields. Conforming authoring tools already emit complete subject-bearing actions, so practical risk is expected to be low. The migration notes identify the affected behavior present in recent versions.
Validation