Skip to content

⚡️ Speed up method PipelineBuilder.pipe by 180% - #16

Open
codeflash-ai[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
codeflash/optimize-PipelineBuilder.pipe-mgrkzv0e
Open

⚡️ Speed up method PipelineBuilder.pipe by 180%#16
codeflash-ai[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
codeflash/optimize-PipelineBuilder.pipe-mgrkzv0e

Conversation

@codeflash-ai

@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai Bot commented Oct 15, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

📄 180% (1.80x) speedup for PipelineBuilder.pipe in src/spdl/pipeline/_builder.py

⏱️ Runtime : 47.7 microseconds 17.0 microseconds (best of 44 runs)

📝 Explanation and details

The optimization replaces an expensive isinstance(op, SupportsGetItem) check with a more efficient duck-typing approach using getattr(op, "__getitem__", None).

Key Changes:

  • Replaced isinstance(op, SupportsGetItem) with getitem = getattr(op, "__getitem__", None) followed by if getitem is not None and callable(getitem)
  • This avoids the overhead of Python's Abstract Base Class (ABC) machinery used by typing protocols

Why It's Faster:
The isinstance check with typing protocols like SupportsGetItem involves complex metaclass machinery and registration checks that are computationally expensive. The getattr approach directly queries the object's attribute dictionary, which is a simple hash table lookup - orders of magnitude faster.

Performance Impact:
Line profiler shows the original isinstance check took 94,999ns (72.1% of total time), while the optimized getattr + callable checks took only 1,786ns combined (4.2% of total time). This represents a ~53x improvement for this specific check, leading to the overall 179% speedup.

Test Case Performance:
This optimization is particularly effective for workloads that frequently create Pipe configurations, especially when the op parameter is typically a function/callable rather than a container with __getitem__. The duck-typing approach performs well regardless of the input type while being consistently faster than protocol checking.

Correctness verification report:

Test Status
⚙️ Existing Unit Tests 86 Passed
🌀 Generated Regression Tests 🔘 None Found
⏪ Replay Tests 🔘 None Found
🔎 Concolic Coverage Tests 🔘 None Found
📊 Tests Coverage 100.0%
⚙️ Existing Unit Tests and Runtime
Test File::Test Function Original ⏱️ Optimized ⏱️ Speedup
spdl_unittest/dataloader/pipeline_test.py::test_pipeline_stage_hook_wrong_def1 23.7μs 8.56μs 177%✅
spdl_unittest/dataloader/pipeline_test.py::test_pipeline_stage_hook_wrong_def2 24.0μs 8.46μs 183%✅

To edit these changes git checkout codeflash/optimize-PipelineBuilder.pipe-mgrkzv0e and push.

Codeflash

The optimization replaces an expensive `isinstance(op, SupportsGetItem)` check with a more efficient duck-typing approach using `getattr(op, "__getitem__", None)`. 

**Key Changes:**
- Replaced `isinstance(op, SupportsGetItem)` with `getitem = getattr(op, "__getitem__", None)` followed by `if getitem is not None and callable(getitem)`
- This avoids the overhead of Python's Abstract Base Class (ABC) machinery used by typing protocols

**Why It's Faster:**
The `isinstance` check with typing protocols like `SupportsGetItem` involves complex metaclass machinery and registration checks that are computationally expensive. The `getattr` approach directly queries the object's attribute dictionary, which is a simple hash table lookup - orders of magnitude faster.

**Performance Impact:**
Line profiler shows the original `isinstance` check took 94,999ns (72.1% of total time), while the optimized `getattr` + `callable` checks took only 1,786ns combined (4.2% of total time). This represents a ~53x improvement for this specific check, leading to the overall 179% speedup.

**Test Case Performance:**
This optimization is particularly effective for workloads that frequently create `Pipe` configurations, especially when the `op` parameter is typically a function/callable rather than a container with `__getitem__`. The duck-typing approach performs well regardless of the input type while being consistently faster than protocol checking.
@codeflash-ai
codeflash-ai Bot requested a review from mashraf-222 October 15, 2025 05:59
@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai Bot added the ⚡️ codeflash Optimization PR opened by Codeflash AI label Oct 15, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

⚡️ codeflash Optimization PR opened by Codeflash AI

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants