fix(webhooks): Admit Jared reviewer and mention events - #156
Merged
Conversation
Preserve explicit reviewer and mention context so Jared, rather than the outer webhook filter, decides whether an event is actionable.
Deploying with
|
| Status | Name | Latest Commit | Updated (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❌ Deployment failed View logs |
jared | 64dc341 | Aug 26 2026, 10:17 AM |
Use GitHub's review-request event, keep assignee events out of reviewer routing, and synchronize both runtime instruction sets.
Route issue edits that directly mention Jared while ignoring persistent mentions and reviewer fields on unrelated lifecycle events.
Scope direct-mention detection to the body changed by each webhook and require edited bodies to add Jared's mention.
Require Jared to fetch, compare, and integrate the latest default branch instead of mistaking upstream sync for freshness.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Webhook admission now preserves explicit reviewer and mention involvement, so Jared—not the outer label-or-author filter—decides whether those events are actionable. Direct mentions on unlabelled issues are routed to work, and the prompt states why an event was admitted.
Review focus: the intended boundary between newly admitted, relevant events and the existing duplicate, self-event, and CI-noise filters.