Fix SILKY_IGNORE_PATHS using path instead of path_info#577
Open
djmango wants to merge 1 commit intojazzband:masterfrom
Open
Fix SILKY_IGNORE_PATHS using path instead of path_info#577djmango wants to merge 1 commit intojazzband:masterfrom
djmango wants to merge 1 commit intojazzband:masterfrom
Conversation
Proposed solution in jazzband#349 @shimizukawa @Korben11
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #577 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 84.60% 84.07% -0.54%
==========================================
Files 52 52
Lines 2072 2072
==========================================
- Hits 1753 1742 -11
- Misses 319 330 +11 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Proposed solution in #349
@shimizukawa
@Korben11