DNM: dry run ci for upstream e2e test changes#465
Conversation
|
Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request. |
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
You’ve run out of usage credits. Purchase more in the billing tab. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Repository: openshift/coderabbit/.coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Enterprise Run ID: ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (33)
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughThe README.md file received a formatting adjustment to the placement of the "### Operator Status" subheading at line 9. No content was modified; only the whitespace or line positioning was changed. ChangesREADME Structure
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes Suggested reviewers
Important Pre-merge checks failedPlease resolve all errors before merging. Addressing warnings is optional. ❌ Failed checks (1 error, 2 warnings)
✅ Passed checks (9 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
/testwith openshift/cloud-provider-aws/main/e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview openshift/cloud-provider-aws#153 |
Do Not Merge / wip
Testing CI execution in downstream following up on planned upstream changes to aws ccm e2e tests.
Summary by CodeRabbit