-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 64
NO-ISSUE: migrate required status checks to GitHub rulesets #131
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
larsks
merged 1 commit into
osac-project:main
from
rccrdpccl:ci/migrate-status-checks-to-rulesets
Jul 16, 2026
+36
−4
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
📐 Maintainability & Code Quality | 🔵 Trivial | ⚡ Quick win
Add a Terraform plan CI workflow.
Regarding your question about adding a
tf planCI job: Yes, it is strongly recommended. Runningterraform fmt -check,terraform validate, andterraform planon pull requests validates configuration syntax and previews infrastructure changes, preventing unexpected enforcement gaps or errors upon merge.Would you like me to generate a GitHub Actions workflow snippet or open a new issue to implement this?
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
should be a separate PR
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@rccrdpccl, that makes sense—keeping infra changes and CI tooling changes separate is good practice. Would you like me to open a follow-up issue to track adding thetf plan/fmt/validateCI workflow?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The reason there is no
tf planpre-commit job is because that requires credentials to access state storage, so it wouldn't work for pull requests from forked repositories.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There are ways to work around that: see environment protection, or pull_request_target, etc. if this is of interest I could craft a PR.
In any case, I do not think it should be done in this PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
example PR #132