Test Automatic Codex Review (DO NOT MERGE) - #4258
Conversation
an existing detection. this is to test automatic code review via codex. DO NOT MERGE
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
pyth0n1c
changed the title
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: f93053969e
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| from datamodel=Network_Resolution where | ||
| DNS.query=* | ||
| NOT DNS.query IN ("-", "unknown") | ||
| NOT DNS.query IN ("-", "unknown", "something_new) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The added "something_new value has no closing quote, so Splunk cannot parse this production detection when it is deployed or executed. As a result, the search will fail instead of evaluating 3CX indicators; close the string before the closing parenthesis.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
creation_date. This should not trigger automatic review. But I tried be able to trigger with @codex review comment
|
@codex review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 02097a4e6d
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| version: 11 | ||
| creation_date: '2023-04-11' | ||
| modification_date: '2026-05-13' | ||
| creation_date: '2023-02-11' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For this existing detection, changing creation_date from 2023-04-11 to 2023-02-11 corrupts its historical metadata. The EventBasedDetection schema explicitly defines this field as the object's original creation date and says it should never be updated (schemas/EventBasedDetection.schema.json:6841-6845), so retain the prior value and use modification_date for this change.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
|
Feel free to close this PR whenever - it exists to successfully demonstrate Codex review usage. |
2 participants
DO NOT MERGE
Add a dangling quote to an existing detection.
This is to test automatic
code review via codex.