⚡️ Speed up function __dir__ by 58% - #13
Open
codeflash-ai[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
The optimization implements **caching for the `__dir__()` function** to avoid repeatedly sorting the same static `__all__` list on every call. **Key changes:** 1. **Added explicit `__all__` definition** with the four module names 2. **Implemented function-level caching** using `hasattr()` to check if the sorted result is already cached on the function object 3. **Cached the sorted result** as `__dir__._sorted_all` after the first computation **Why this is faster:** - The original code calls `sorted(__all__)` on every invocation, which has O(n log n) complexity - The optimized version only sorts once and reuses the cached result, making subsequent calls O(1) - Since `__all__` is static (contains the same 4 module names), caching is safe and correct **Performance benefits:** - **58% overall speedup** (12.9μs → 8.16μs) - Test results show **40-80% improvement** across various scenarios - Particularly effective for repeated calls, which is common when `__dir__()` is used for introspection or auto-completion - The caching overhead (hasattr check + attribute access) is minimal compared to the sorting cost This optimization is especially beneficial when `__dir__()` is called multiple times in interactive environments or tools that perform module introspection.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
📄 58% (0.58x) speedup for
__dir__insrc/spdl/io/lib/__init__.py⏱️ Runtime :
12.9 microseconds→8.16 microseconds(best of583runs)📝 Explanation and details
The optimization implements caching for the
__dir__()function to avoid repeatedly sorting the same static__all__list on every call.Key changes:
__all__definition with the four module nameshasattr()to check if the sorted result is already cached on the function object__dir__._sorted_allafter the first computationWhy this is faster:
sorted(__all__)on every invocation, which has O(n log n) complexity__all__is static (contains the same 4 module names), caching is safe and correctPerformance benefits:
__dir__()is used for introspection or auto-completionThis optimization is especially beneficial when
__dir__()is called multiple times in interactive environments or tools that perform module introspection.✅ Correctness verification report:
🌀 Generated Regression Tests and Runtime
🔎 Concolic Coverage Tests and Runtime
codeflash_concolic_uafn4wd5/tmp5chtx5sy/test_concolic_coverage.py::test___dir__To edit these changes
git checkout codeflash/optimize-__dir__-mgreni92and push.